Case Study of a Failed M&A—The Role of Environment in Microsoft’s Acquisition of Nokia

Updated: Mar 26, 2021

The citizens of Finland were unhappy with the announced Microsoft-Nokia merger. The Finns had long felt national pride from Nokia’s success. Giving up control of this national company to a foreign entity was a blow to their identity. Microsoft did little to alleviate the Finns’ concerns.

Public Acceptance

Public Perception

News and media critics (as well as citizens) in both the U.S. and Finland expressed dislike for Microsoft’s acquisition of Nokia’s mobile unit. From Microsoft’s perspective, many viewed the deal as a gamble – and a poor one – as Nokia was perceived to be a dying company. In fact, many decried the deal as a desperate attempt to get into the mobile phone market and gain market share from Google and Apple.

People in Finland reacted very critically towards the acquisition. Nokia was seen as one of Finland’s most successful companies, even though its market share had been declining. The sale of Nokia’s phone division “was a huge psychological blow for Finland and the self-confidence of the Finnish people.”


The deal left many Finns with a sour taste toward Nokia. One Finns’ reaction to the acquisition displays Finnish resistance to the deal: “‘Nokia is one of Finland’s main brands, and it’s what I tell people abroad —that Nokia phones are from Finland,’ she said. ‘Now I can’t say that anymore.’”


As Finns saw one of the biggest and most powerful companies from their nation swallowed by an American company, it was an emotional blow to their national pride. Nokia had been one of the biggest contributors to Finland’s GDP and now it would no longer be considered a “Finnish company” but would merely be a cog in an American corporation.



With permission from Nokia’s leaders, Microsoft Mobile decided to take over Nokia’s original headquarters located just outside of Helsinki, Finland. One spokesperson from Nokia said, “As the majority of employees currently working at our corporate headquarters are focused on devices & services activities and support functions, Nokia House will become a Microsoft site once the deal closes.”


Similar to before the acquisition, employees of the new merged company would have to fly to Finland in order to help with decision making or make long-distance calls at hours outside of the normal work day to compensate for the 10-hour time zone difference.

Regulatory Differences

Since the U.S. and Finland share a positive relationship, no lengthy legal procedures were required on either side of the acquisition. The only regulatory term discussed in the press was the lack of communication between the two companies and the public regarding the merger. As one reporter stated, “Neither party was legally allowed to discuss details about the acquisition in public.”


Previous: Case Study of a Failed M&A—The Role of Management in Microsoft’s Acquisition of Nokia

Next: M&A Synergies Framework-The Role of Accounting and Finance in the Microsoft-Nokia Merger

Related Content:

Case Study of a Failed M&A—Concluding Thoughts on Microsoft's Acquisition of Nokia Had Microsoft recognized the differences in the synergies between the company, the acquisition of Nokia would have resulted in a…

Case Study of a Failed M&A—The Role of Management in Microsoft's Acquisition of Nokia Differences in leadership, including management goals, vision, and actions, created problems that could have been avoided in Microsoft's acquisition of…

Case Study of a Failed M&A— Introduction to Microsoft's Acquisition of Nokia An introduction into Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia that soon became one of the worst acquisitions in the history of M&A.



#Integration #Environment #Acquisition #Merger #Nationalculture #Nokia #Failure #Culture #Finland #Microsoft #Crossborder #SynergiesFramework #Smartphone #StephenElop #Casestudy

1,338 views0 comments